di Alessandro Giovannelli
PISTOIA – 𝖫’𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗂𝖾𝗋𝗂, 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝟣𝟢 𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝗎𝗂 𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗁𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝖾 𝗅𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗓𝗓𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗅 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗂 𝖯𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗂𝖺 𝖡𝗅𝗎𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗂 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖠𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 (𝗀𝗂à di per sé, 𝗎𝗇 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗀𝗀𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝗎𝗇 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖾, 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗂 𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍à 𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖾) 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗅’𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗇𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗂 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂 𝗆𝗈𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 – 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 – 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂.
𝖯𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗋𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗂𝗈 𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 è 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗇 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈. 𝖨𝗇 𝗎𝗇 𝗆𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗏𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖠𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖳𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗂 𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗅 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗀𝗅𝗂 𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗂.
𝖤’ 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗓𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗂 𝖽𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗂 𝖿𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖵 (𝖡𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈, 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗆𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾) 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂 𝗁𝖺 𝗀𝗂𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝖾 (𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗍à 𝖽𝗂 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾, 𝗌𝗈𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗎𝗍𝗍𝗈 , 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾) 𝗎𝗇 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖫𝖾𝗀𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝖡𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗅’𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗓𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥 𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗅 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥-𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟧, 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗂 𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗂 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖠𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖾 𝖱𝗂𝖼𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖹𝗎𝖼𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝖽𝗂 𝖥𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗂 𝖽’𝖨𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗁𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝟤, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗆𝖺 𝟣-𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖫𝖾𝗀𝗀𝖾 𝗇. 𝟤𝟥𝟪/𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟤 (𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂 𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗂 𝖽𝗂 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖾), 𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖾𝖻𝖻𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗅’𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝟤𝟧𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗅𝗂 𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥 𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦
𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂 𝗌𝗈𝗇𝗈 𝗂 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗂.
𝖫’𝖺𝗎𝗌𝗉𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈 è 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝖾. 𝖳𝗎𝗍𝗍𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗅’𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗉𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 – 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝗂 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗏𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗅𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂 – 𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖨𝗇 𝖻𝗎𝗈𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗓𝖺, 𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖾𝖻𝖻𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖾, 𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖾, 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗀𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝗂 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗋𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗂, 𝗂𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅𝖾. 𝖣𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖽𝖾 𝟧 𝖺𝗇𝗇𝗂 𝖿𝖺, 𝗂𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗓𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗂 𝗌𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖻𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇 𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈.
𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗋ò, è il 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖾 𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗍𝖾. 𝖫’𝖠𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗅 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗂 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗅 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗈 è già tale 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝗆𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗅 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥, 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗓𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂, 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗅𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅 𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅, 𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗇 𝖼𝗂 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗋𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗍𝗂 (𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗁𝖾 – 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗁é 𝗇𝗈? – 𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝗓𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗇 𝗉𝗎ò 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗅’𝖠𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗂 𝖽𝗂 𝗎𝗇 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗅 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖾).
𝖨𝗇 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈, 𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂 𝗉𝗂ù, 𝗅𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗅’𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂. 𝖨𝗇 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗍à, 𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 è 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾 è già 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈.
